Gestão & Produção
https://gestaoeproducao.com/article/doi/10.1590/1806-9649-2022v29e1821
Gestão & Produção
Artigo Original

Organizational structure as antecedent of dynamic capability

Rodrigo Valio Dominguez Gonzalez

Downloads: 0
Views: 58

Abstract

Abstract: Dynamic capability is recognized in the academic and business context as an essential factor for the firm to build differential and remain competitive in dynamic markets. Most of these preliminary studies assess dynamic capability from the perspective of the resource-based view of the firm. This study advances on this theme by analyzing the impact of knowledge-based dynamic capability, based on the knowledge based vision of firm, about innovation of project team. Previous studies have identified the relationship between dynamic capability and innovation or organizational performance, but there is a gap in the theory that relates antecedents of dynamic capability. Thus, this research aims to analyze the relationship between organizational structure and dynamic capability on the innovative capacity of project teams. To achieve this objective, 65 project teams from industrial companies in the state of São Paulo were studied and the data were analyzed using the technique of structural equation modeling - partial least squares (SEM_PLS). The results show that structures with a higher degree of formalization and centralization have a negative impact on knowledge-based dynamic capability, and integration has a positive relationship with dynamic capability. Furthermore, the research shows that the innovative capacity of project teams is directly affected by the ability to generate and combine knowledge, however, the acquisition / absorption of knowledge does not interfere with the innovation activity of these teams.

Keywords

Knowledge-based dynamic capability, Organizational structure, Innovation, Project team, Industry

Referências

Acharya, A., & Mishra, B. (2017). Exploring the relationship between organizational structure and knowledge retention: a study of the Indian infrastructure consulting sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(4), 961-985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0506.

Ali, A., Bahadur, W., Wang, N., Luqman, A., & Khan, A. N. (2020). Improving team innovation performance: role of social media and team knowledge management capabilities. Technology in Society, 61, 101259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101259.

Ali, A., Wang, H., Khan, A. N., Pitafi, A. H., & Amin, M. W. (2019). Exploring the knowledge-focused role of interdependent members on team creative performance. Asian Business & Management, 18(2), 98-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41291-018-00050-2.

Andrews, M. C., & Kacmar, K. M. (2001). Discriminating among organizational politics, justice, and support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(4), 347-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.92.

Biemann, T., Cole, M. S., & Voelpel, S. (2012). Within-group agreement: on the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG(J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 66-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.006.

Brandon-Jones, A., & Knoppen, D. (2018). The role of strategic purchasing in dynamic capability development and deployment: a contingency perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(2), 446-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2015-0656.

Burcharth, A. L. L., Lettl, C., & Ulhoi, J. P. (2015). Extending organizational antecedents of absorptive capacity: organizational characteristics that encourage experimentation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 269-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.024.

Burns, T., & Stalker, M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.

Burpitt, W. J., & Bigoness, W. J. (1997). Leadership and innovation among teams. Small Group Research, 28(3), 414-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496497283005.

Calabuig, V., Olcina, G., & Panebianco, F. (2018). Culture and team production. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 149, 32-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.03.004.

Centro das Indústrias do Estado de São Paulo - CIESP. (2021). Retrieved in 2020, July 15, from http://ebgebrasil.com.br/industrias/sp

Chen, C.-J., Huang, J.-W., & Hsiao, Y.-C. (2010). Knowledge management and innovativeness: the role of organisational climate and structure. International Journal of Manpower, 31(8), 848-870. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437721011088548.

Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. Chin, J. Henseler & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655-690). Berlin: Springer. . http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29.

Chión, S. J., Charles, V. C., & Morales, J. (2019). The impact of organizational culture, organizational structure and technological infrastructure on process improvement through knowledge sharing. Business Process Management Journal, 26(6), 1443-1472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2018-0279.

Choi, S. Y., Lee, Y., & Yoo, Y. (2010). The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: a field study. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 34(4), 855-870. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25750708.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393553.

Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.

Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (1998). Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: the role of environmental change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15(1), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(97)00029-5.

Denford, J. S. (2013). Building knowledge: developing a knowledge-based dynamic capabilities typology. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 175-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673271311315150.

Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: designing dual structures for innovation. In R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy & D. P. Slevin (Eds.), Strategy and implementation (Vol. 1, pp. 167-188). New York: North-Holland Publishing.

Evanschitzky, H., Eisend, M., Calantone, R. J., & Jiang, Y. (2012). Success factors of product innovation: an updated meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29, 21-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00964.x.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.

Geisser, S. (1975). The predictive sample reuse method with applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 320-328.

Germain, R. (1996). The role of context and structure in radical and incremental logistics innovation adoption. Journal of Business Research, 35(2), 117-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00053-4.

Gonzalez, R. V. D., & Melo, T. M. (2019). Analyzing dynamic capability in teamwork. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(6), 1196-1217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2018-0478.

Gonzalez, R. V. D., & Melo, T. M. (2021). How do autonomy, cohesion and integration of teamwork impact the dynamic capability? Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32(7-8), 794-810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2019.1636640.

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110.

Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(3), 191-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1330191.

Gupta, A. K. (2021). Innovation dimensions and firm performance synergy in the emerging market: a perspective from dynamic capability theory & signaling theory. Technology in Society, 64, 101512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101512.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). London: Sage.

Henard, D. H., & Szymanski, D. M. (2001). Why some new products are more successful than others. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 362-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.3.362.18861.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.

Hermano, V., & Martín-Cruz, N. (2016). The role of top management involvement in firms performing projects: a dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3447-3458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.041.

Jansen, J. J. P., van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576.

Jansen, J. J. P., van den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (2005). Managing potential and real-ized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999-1015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573106.

Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 31(4), 783-808. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25148820.

Kim, L. (1980). Organizational innovation and structure. Journal of Business Research, 8(2), 225-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(80)90012-0.

Liao, C., Chuang, S., & To, P. (2011). How knowledge management mediates the relationship between environment and organizational structure. Journal of Business Research, 64(7), 728-736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.08.001.

Lin, H. E., Hsu, I. C., Hsu, A. W., & Chung, H. M. (2020). Creating competitive advantages: interactions between ambidextrous diversification strategy and contextual factors from a dynamic capability perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119952.

Liu, M. L., Lin, C. P., Joe, S. W., & Chen, K. J. (2019). Modeling knowledge sharing and team performance: the interactions of ethical leadership and ambidexterity with politics and job complexity. Management Decision, 57(7), 1472-1495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0052.

Mahmud, M., Soetanto, D., & Jack, S. (2020). Environmental management and product innovation: the moderating role of the dynamic capability of small manufacturing firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121633.

Martínez-Román, J. A., Gamero, J., Tamayo, J. A., & Delgado-González, L. (2020). Empirical analysis of organizational archetypes based on generation and adoption of knowledge and technologies. Technovation, 96-97, 102145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102145.

Mell, J. N., van Knippenberg, D., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2013). The catalyst effect: the impact of transactive memory system structure on team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1154-1173. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0589.

Mihalache, O. R., Jansen, J. J. P., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2014). Top management team shared leadership and organizational ambidexterity: a moderated mediation framework. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(2), 128-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sej.1168.

Monteiro, G. P., Hopkins, A., & Melo, P. F. F. (2020). How do organizational structures impact operational safety? Part 1–Understanding the dangers of decentralization. Safety Science, 123, 104568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104568.

Nath, P., & Ramanathan, R. (2016). Environmental management practices, environmental technology portfolio, and environmental commitment: a content analytic approach for UK manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 171(3), 427-437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.09.040.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creation company: how japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ruekert, R. W., Walker, O. C., Jr., & Roering, K. J. (1985). The organization of marketing activities: acontingency theory of structure and performance. Journal of Marketing, 49(1), 13-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900102.

Shepard, H. A. (1967). Innovation-resisting and innovation-producing organizations.The Journal of Business, 40(4), 470-477.

Szymanski, D. M., Kroff, M. W., & Troy, L. C. (2007). Innovativeness and new product success: insights from the cumulative evidence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 35-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-006-0014-0.

Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility. California Management Review, 58(4), 13-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.

Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005.

Thompson, V. A. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10(1), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2391646.

Walheiser, D., Schwens, C., Steinberg, P. J., & Cadogan, J. W. (2021). Greasing the wheels or blocking the path? Organizational structure, product innovativeness, and new product success. Journal of Business Research, 126, 489-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.021.

Wang, C. L., Senaratne, C., & Rafiq, M. (2015). Success traps, dynamic capabilities and firm performance. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 26-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12066.

Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quartely, 33(1), 177-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20650284.

Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991-995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.318.

Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4134351.

Zheng, S., Zhang, W., & Du, J. (2011). Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities and innovation in networked environments. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 1035-1051. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179352.

Zheng, W., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 763-771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.06.005.

Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780.

Zotoo, I. K., Lu, Z., & Liu, G. (2021). Big data management capabilities and librarians’ innovative performance: the role of value perception using the theory of knowledge-based dynamic capability. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(2), 102272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102272.
 

62505f37a9539538683c23f4 gp Articles

Gest. Prod.

Share this page
Page Sections