Organizational structure as antecedent of dynamic capability
Acharya, A., & Mishra, B. (2017). Exploring the relationship between organizational structure and knowledge retention: a study of the Indian infrastructure consulting sector.
Ali, A., Bahadur, W., Wang, N., Luqman, A., & Khan, A. N. (2020). Improving team innovation performance: role of social media and team knowledge management capabilities.
Ali, A., Wang, H., Khan, A. N., Pitafi, A. H., & Amin, M. W. (2019). Exploring the knowledge-focused role of interdependent members on team creative performance.
Andrews, M. C., & Kacmar, K. M. (2001). Discriminating among organizational politics, justice, and support.
Biemann, T., Cole, M. S., & Voelpel, S. (2012). Within-group agreement: on the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG(J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines.
Brandon-Jones, A., & Knoppen, D. (2018). The role of strategic purchasing in dynamic capability development and deployment: a contingency perspective.
Burcharth, A. L. L., Lettl, C., & Ulhoi, J. P. (2015). Extending organizational antecedents of absorptive capacity: organizational characteristics that encourage experimentation.
Burns, T., & Stalker, M. (1961).
Burpitt, W. J., & Bigoness, W. J. (1997). Leadership and innovation among teams.
Calabuig, V., Olcina, G., & Panebianco, F. (2018). Culture and team production.
Centro das Indústrias do Estado de São Paulo - CIESP. (2021). Retrieved in 2020, July 15, from
Chen, C.-J., Huang, J.-W., & Hsiao, Y.-C. (2010). Knowledge management and innovativeness: the role of organisational climate and structure.
Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. Chin, J. Henseler & H. Wang (Eds.),
Chión, S. J., Charles, V. C., & Morales, J. (2019). The impact of organizational culture, organizational structure and technological infrastructure on process improvement through knowledge sharing.
Choi, S. Y., Lee, Y., & Yoo, Y. (2010). The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: a field study.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators.
Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (1998). Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: the role of environmental change.
Denford, J. S. (2013). Building knowledge: developing a knowledge-based dynamic capabilities typology.
Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: designing dual structures for innovation. In R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy & D. P. Slevin (Eds.),
Evanschitzky, H., Eisend, M., Calantone, R. J., & Jiang, Y. (2012). Success factors of product innovation: an updated meta-analysis.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.
Geisser, S. (1975). The predictive sample reuse method with applications.
Germain, R. (1996). The role of context and structure in radical and incremental logistics innovation adoption.
Gonzalez, R. V. D., & Melo, T. M. (2019). Analyzing dynamic capability in teamwork.
Gonzalez, R. V. D., & Melo, T. M. (2021). How do autonomy, cohesion and integration of teamwork impact the dynamic capability?
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm.
Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature.
Gupta, A. K. (2021). Innovation dimensions and firm performance synergy in the emerging market: a perspective from dynamic capability theory & signaling theory.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2013).
Henard, D. H., & Szymanski, D. M. (2001). Why some new products are more successful than others.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling.
Hermano, V., & Martín-Cruz, N. (2016). The role of top management involvement in firms performing projects: a dynamic capabilities approach.
Jansen, J. J. P., van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators.
Jansen, J. J. P., van den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (2005). Managing potential and real-ized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter?
Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time.
Kim, L. (1980). Organizational innovation and structure.
Liao, C., Chuang, S., & To, P. (2011). How knowledge management mediates the relationship between environment and organizational structure.
Lin, H. E., Hsu, I. C., Hsu, A. W., & Chung, H. M. (2020). Creating competitive advantages: interactions between ambidextrous diversification strategy and contextual factors from a dynamic capability perspective.
Liu, M. L., Lin, C. P., Joe, S. W., & Chen, K. J. (2019). Modeling knowledge sharing and team performance: the interactions of ethical leadership and ambidexterity with politics and job complexity.
Mahmud, M., Soetanto, D., & Jack, S. (2020). Environmental management and product innovation: the moderating role of the dynamic capability of small manufacturing firms.
Martínez-Román, J. A., Gamero, J., Tamayo, J. A., & Delgado-González, L. (2020). Empirical analysis of organizational archetypes based on generation and adoption of knowledge and technologies.
Mell, J. N., van Knippenberg, D., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2013). The catalyst effect: the impact of transactive memory system structure on team performance.
Mihalache, O. R., Jansen, J. J. P., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2014). Top management team shared leadership and organizational ambidexterity: a moderated mediation framework.
Monteiro, G. P., Hopkins, A., & Melo, P. F. F. (2020). How do organizational structures impact operational safety? Part 1–Understanding the dangers of decentralization.
Nath, P., & Ramanathan, R. (2016). Environmental management practices, environmental technology portfolio, and environmental commitment: a content analytic approach for UK manufacturing firms.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995).
Ruekert, R. W., Walker, O. C., Jr., & Roering, K. J. (1985). The organization of marketing activities: acontingency theory of structure and performance.
Shepard, H. A. (1967). Innovation-resisting and innovation-producing organizations.
Szymanski, D. M., Kroff, M. W., & Troy, L. C. (2007). Innovativeness and new product success: insights from the cumulative evidence.
Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling.
Thompson, V. A. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation.
Walheiser, D., Schwens, C., Steinberg, P. J., & Cadogan, J. W. (2021). Greasing the wheels or blocking the path? Organizational structure, product innovativeness, and new product success.
Wang, C. L., Senaratne, C., & Rafiq, M. (2015). Success traps, dynamic capabilities and firm performance.
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration.
Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension.
Zheng, S., Zhang, W., & Du, J. (2011). Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities and innovation in networked environments.
Zheng, W., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness mediating role of knowledge management.
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities.
Zotoo, I. K., Lu, Z., & Liu, G. (2021). Big data management capabilities and librarians’ innovative performance: the role of value perception using the theory of knowledge-based dynamic capability.