Gestão & Produção
https://gestaoeproducao.com/article/doi/10.1590/1806-9649-2020v28e5197
Gestão & Produção
Artigo Original

From enthusiasts to systematic innovation: the journey of building the innovation function in a large industrial organization

Júlio Cézar Fonseca de Melo; Raoni Barros Bagno; Beatriz Costa Pinto Rio; Mario Sergio Salerno; Ana Valéria Carneiro Dias; Jonathan Simões Freitas

Downloads: 0
Views: 100

Abstract

Abstract: : The creation of a management system to systematically promote innovation is a great challenge for large companies. Some authors argue for the creation of a dedicated organizational function (the Innovation Function – IF) to guide this system. This paper aims to understand how a large company builds an Innovation Function from a longitudinal and retrospective case study. Some aspects regarding the emergence of the IF, its organizational structure evolution, and changes on its team’s scope of action are discussed. The main results highlight the importance of key actors for IF’s recognition by the organization, serving as connecting mediators to other functions and external agents. Besides that, specific competence accumulation, gradual legitimacy acquisition, and project intermediary results enabled the team to deal with radical innovation projects over time.

Keywords

Innovation, Innovation Management, Innovation Management System, Innovation Function

Referências

Bagno, R. B., Salerno, M. S., & da Silva, D. O. (2017a). Models with graphical representation for innovation management: a literature review. R & D Management, 47(4), 637-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/radm.12254.

Bagno, R. B., Salerno, M. S., & Dias, A. V. C. (2017b). Innovation as a new organizational function: evidence and characterization from large industrial companies in Brazil. Production, 27, e20162073. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.207316.

Börjesson, S., Elmquist, M., & Hooge, S. (2014). The challenges of innovation capability building: learning from longitudinal studies of innovation efforts at Renault and Volvo Cars. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 31(1), 120-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.11.005.

Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.

Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011). The Open Innovation Journey: how firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation, 31(1), 34-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.007.

de Melo, J. C. F., & Bagno, R. B. (2017). Atribuições de um time dedicado à gestão da inovação em um grupo industrial brasileiro: um estudo longitudinal baseado em eventos. Revista Produção Online, 17(2), 482-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v17i2.2376.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E.

Figueiredo, P. N. (2002). Learning processes features and technological capability-accumulation: explaining inter-firm differences. Technovation, 22(11), 685-698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00068-2.

Goffin, K., & Mitchell, R. (2010). Innovation management: strategy implementation using the pentathlon framework. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04752-6.

Granovetter, M. S. (1977). The strength of weak ties. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Social networks: a developing paradigm (pp. 347-367). USA: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-442450-0.50025-0.

Heise, D. R., & Durig, A. (1997). A frame for organizational actions and macroactions. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 22(2), 95-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1997.9990197.

Kouamé, S., & Langley, A. (2018). Relating microprocesses to macro‐outcomes in qualitative strategy process and practice research. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 559-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.2726.

Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248.

Langley, A. N. N., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.4001.

Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2391211.

Leifer, R., McDermott, C. M., O’connor, G. C., Peters, L. S., Rice, M. P., & Veryzer, R. W., Jr. (2000). Radical innovation: how mature companies can outsmart upstarts. Canada: Harvard Business Press.

Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879.

O’Connor, G. C. (2008). Major Innovation as a dynamic capability: a system approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(4), 313-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00304.x.

O’Connor, G. C. (2012). Innovation: from process to function. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(3), 361-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00909.x.

O’Connor, G. C., Corbett, A. C., & Peters, L. S. (2018). Beyond the champion: institutionalizing innovation through people. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

O’Connor, G. C., Leifer, Ri., Paulson, A. S., & Peters, L. S. (2008). Grabbing lightning: building a capability for breakthrough innovation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0.

Pich, M. T., Loch, C. H., & Meyer, A. D. (2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Science, 48(8), 1008-1023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163.

Salerno, M. S., & Gomes, L. A. V. (2018). Gestão da inovação (mais) radical. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

Scott, J. (1988). Social network analysis. Sociology, 22(1), 109-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038588022001007.

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478.

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
 

60ccb0eea953956cd9666d22 gp Articles

Gest. Prod.

Share this page
Page Sections